However people who saw the original comic and saw the progressive edits that gradually became more and more abstract would have often understood. Like many imageboard memes, it was an in-joke.

Spoiler: The original is this comic.

The cost of Apple hardware and my disdain for their products.

Shout-out to !fuck_cars@lemmy.ml

Great, what I’m looking for is an explicit example of that, because I dont’ know where to find it. Any suggestions or links?

edit: to clarify, I’m not sure if ‘demon slayer’ is ‘content for children’ even if it’s about teenagers who I think shouldn’t be sexualized, so I’m looking for something relevant to why the kind of censorship in the opening post is censored.

I don’t disagree with being against the sexualization of children. Of course not.

That doesn’t answer my question in any way whatsoever and I don’t know why you thought it was relevant. “Has the Chinese ruling party provided an explicit reason for why this type of content is changed?” I’m not asking for our speculation.

Has the Chinese ruling party provided an explicit reason for why this type of content is changed? I see a lot of assumptions and speculation, sure, but I can’t yet find a reliable source.

Buy air from the 80s!

Obviously they should have created a demand for bionic eyes.

Maybe they get to ‘forcibly employ’ your body to pay off debts.

We’ve already seen teledildonic chastity ransomware, I’m now waiting for limb rootkits.

It would be morbid but interesting to know if there are accidents caused by this, leading to litigation. Take the close call with the stairs in the article, or a car crash. How would an (e.g.) US court treat it? Do recipients sign away rights?